View Full Version : G50
effvee
February 16th 2016, 05:43
Hi everyone a co-woker use to work on Porsche. I told him of m500 0 fanticy of stuffing a Porsche 5speed tiptronic into my keeper. He but fast, downed that ideal, but he said that he had a g50. I'm really having money troubles, so he said I could make payments. That was right up my alley, so I ask for a price, his reply was don't worry about it.
He sent me pictures, looks good, but he still won't commit to a fixed price. Now business is business, I will not buy it even on payments,without a firm price. What do you all think.
Lastly, what would be a good price?
Ok,I get to add some more questions. I hear there is allot of trans noise from the g50. Is the a fix, I think Steve C said that he had his trans disassembled, and found nothing. Will sound deading help throughout,even the tunnel. How bad it's the noise?
Steve C
February 19th 2016, 23:07
Hi
Im not sure what going rate is now for a G50, what type is it? You could call a few Porsche wreckers to see what sort of money they want, you will also need a shifter and rod.
My noise issues was that the gearbox was too well mounted and using a non dual mass clutch
I agree get a firm price.
Steve.
effvee
March 3rd 2016, 06:56
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k97/effvee/Mobile%20Uploads/20160302_132822_zpsbfzt79tc.jpg~original (http://s86.photobucket.com/user/effvee/media/Mobile%20Uploads/20160302_132822_zpsbfzt79tc.jpg.html)
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k97/effvee/Mobile%20Uploads/20160302_132644_zpsaeacugwg.jpg~original (http://s86.photobucket.com/user/effvee/media/Mobile%20Uploads/20160302_132644_zpsaeacugwg.jpg.html)
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k97/effvee/Mobile%20Uploads/20160302_132806_zps49p94kyv.jpg~original (http://s86.photobucket.com/user/effvee/media/Mobile%20Uploads/20160302_132806_zps49p94kyv.jpg.html)
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k97/effvee/2012-05-05_19-57-52_326.jpg~original (http://s86.photobucket.com/user/effvee/media/2012-05-05_19-57-52_326.jpg.html)
Hi everyone, here is the g50/01 and the 901 0r 902, still can't tell. I see now, how Porsche made their trans better. bigger, stronger, and heavy:o
The 901 is going into this gold 1302. I think I will still use the 2110 type one turbo engine I have for it, if I can just get on track. However, that g50 will be my keeper:D wow
effvee
March 6th 2016, 00:33
My noise issues was that the gearbox was too well mounted and using a non dual mass clutch
Steve.[/QUOTE]
Steve, what is a non dual mas clutch?
Steve C
March 6th 2016, 02:38
Its a special clutch plate that was used to quieten drive train noises
effvee
March 6th 2016, 03:31
So,it's the not pressure plate? Who makes and sells it,and in what size
Steve C
March 6th 2016, 04:25
G50 Porsche clutches are 240 mm, do some reading on Porsche forums, most people get rid of them and put up with the noise
effvee
March 6th 2016, 04:27
Thank You
Wally
March 9th 2016, 18:27
Don't worry about noise, I don't think its noticebly louder then any other trans ;-)
effvee
March 10th 2016, 02:35
Don't worry about noise, I don't think its noticebly louder then any other trans ;-)
Hi Walter, question, in all of the g50 mods you had done, are there any you would have changed; if you had it to do again?
Wally
March 10th 2016, 03:43
Hmm, interesting question. Actually not really.
Maybe I would have grinded the splines less backwards, but I thought I needed to do that for spacing reasons iirc (?). Reason is I was a little worried when I ran dual disks with it (those have a bigger total spline length/depth), but it turned out afterwards that it holded fine the way it was done.
One last thing: With enough time and even more effort I still would like to have the trans even more forward in the car, but thats just from the theoretical aspect of gaining even better center of gravity.
In reality I have little complaints about the handling, but things can always be improved upon I suppose :-)
effvee
March 10th 2016, 03:54
Hey again, correct me if I am wrong, isn't the transmission as forward as physically possible?
I agree with you on having the transmission as forward as possible, and then with me wanting to couple the trans to a ez-30;and keep the deck in its normal position, will offer its hurdles.
Wally
March 10th 2016, 04:16
Yeah,you're correct: it is.
Thats why I commented that it would take considerable time and effort to move it even more forward. I meant: cut the torsion tubes and weld in structural support without making it all extremely heavy and negating the effect you just gained...
Sorry, I should have been more clear on that ;-)
effvee
March 10th 2016, 04:30
I may have to go with my type IV engine, but no cutting the axle tub.
effvee
March 29th 2016, 04:19
Hmm, interesting question. Actually not really.
Maybe I would have grinded the splines less backwards, but I thought I needed to do that for spacing reasons iirc (?). Reason is I was a little worried when I ran dual disks with it (those have a bigger total spline length/depth), but it turned out afterwards that it holded fine the way it was done.
One last thing: With enough time and even more effort I still would like to have the trans even more forward in the car, but thats just from the theoretical aspect of gaining even better center of gravity.
In reality I have little complaints about the handling, but things can always be improved upon I suppose :-)
Good morning Walter, do you still run double dics clutches?
Wally
March 29th 2016, 07:20
I sold the engine and the 1303 has not run since due to no engine.
So, no, but not because they didn't work or anything negative.
Atm, I am building a new engine (N/A at first) with a different flywheel and 'normal' HD flywheel bolts, so I probably won't use that Tilton double clutch set-up soon again.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.