PDA

View Full Version : bigger master cylinder?


trevorbrady
September 9th 2002, 05:46
I fitted a rear disk brake conversion to my bug this weekend, with Porsche 914 disks and Peugeot 504 calipers (no, I don't know why the manufacturer chose this caliper either :rolleyes: )
I had everything bolted on, plumbed in, adjusted and bled only to find that the stock VW master cylinder can't move enough fluid to have much of an effect on the rear pistons. The result is very soft spongy brakes, and the pedal hitting the floor with very little effort.

Is there any other master cylinder that will bolt in place of the beetle one but have a larger capacity?
I'm thinking of ditching the 504 calipers and sourcing some Golf ones or something. I've already discovered getting parts for the 504 calipers is a bloody nightmare...

BTW, I ended up switching back to the rear drums, cos I had to drive the bug and just don't like the idea of having no brakes!!

Alex
September 9th 2002, 05:53
Have a look at the Kerscher MC.
I think it is 21/19 in size and is used for the Kerscher disk brake kits.

Alex

Steve C
September 9th 2002, 06:58
Hi

I used to have a similar setup, 914 rotors with Golf calipers. They had 36 mm single pistons and worked very well with the stock mc. What size pistons do your Peugot calipers have? Sometimes when you bleed your brakes the MC seals can get damaged when they run over a rough spot in MC that they normally dont travel over except when bleeding the brakes, thatmight explain your lack of pedal now.

Cant stop thinking about that Cheech Marin movie "Born in East LA" every time I hear the word Peugot.

Steve C

trevorbrady
September 9th 2002, 07:20
I can't say what size pistons are in the Peugeot calipers, but looking at the casing and the end of the piston that pushes the pad, it looks like something big, in the region of at least 40mm.

The master cylinder is only about 12 months old. I would hope there wouldn't be too much corrosion on it!

MdR
September 10th 2002, 10:17
I have a 944 split bore (Turbo?) mastercylinder fitted to my chassis. It's nice & shiney, made of Aluminium with 23/20 bore sizes. I can't tell you what it's like to use 'cos the car's STILL in bits BUT it fits the standard mount point perfectly, with a shortened pushrod. The m/cyl has no provision for a std bug brake light pressure switch. I have used a T-piece in the line & fitted the switch to that. A friend has fitted an Audi 100(?) m/cyl & that went in with no problems. His car is in bits too.

Steve C
September 10th 2002, 19:48
Hi

This part of an email that I got from Gropher, a poster on STF, I havn't heard from him for a while but he said some interesting things in relation to M/C sizing

Steve C

====================================

I've misplaced my cheat sheet on which I had evey Porsche caliper's and rotor's specs: piston sizes, caliper dimensions and mounting style, pad area, rotor dimensions & hat/hub offset,
swept area, etc... And of course part numbers and new prices. If I find it, I'll email it to you. I remember most of it off the top of my head, as brakes were a speciality of mine for a number of years.

I wouldn't fret too much about the master cylinder size. I've driven in more cars with poor brake feel because people alculated the exact M/C size by following their original car's ratio of M/C to piston. Very scientific, yes, but that level of accuracy can be overkill. Sizing the M/C can be as much to your driving style -- some people like more pedal travel so that the brake pedal ends up lower when they start to bite, leaving the pedal
about level with the accelerator for easier heel-and-toe operation.

I would say from my experience that you shouldn't go larger than a 19mm M/C. When I've installed 4-piston Turbo or monobloc kits on the front of 914s but retained the dual piston calipers in the rear (after much bias valve adjustment), the 19mm M/C gave a high, firm pedal with adequate range to control modulation. The same is true even when 4-piston rear Turbo calipers are installed. The 914's stock 17mm M/C will even work with the 4-piston calipers up front, but you have almost as much pedal travel as stock. The advantage is little pedal effort is required. A 23mm Mercedes M/C unit is terrible -- little travel, very hard (lots of pedal effort required) and no possibility of modulation

-CC

ricola
September 11th 2002, 03:42
Hi,
Do you know the specs for the Audi m/c?
I found that a stock bug m/c was not sufficient for the early 944 floating caliper brakes, it didn't push enough fluid to the front. As a half way stage I did have 944 on the rear and bug discs on the front and this gave a very nice bias and feel. As people are saying that the stock m/c is fine with the turbo brakes I can only guess that the early caliper pistons withdraw further from the disc when you lift off the pedal resulting in a larger swept volume.
I am currently using a 944 turbo m/c but find this gives too much bias to the front circuit. Are there any other in between options?

Rich

MdR
September 11th 2002, 07:10
Rich
Hi
Ask Moog (Nigel) NCHowe*NOSPAM*@ricardo.com (remove the obvious!). He's got Audi Coupé front calipers on T4 discs & Golf rears on 914/4 discs. I know he needs to know about radiator positions when converting to watercooled power so I'm sure you can trade info!
Martin

Steve C
September 11th 2002, 07:37
Hi

Im using 996 rears on the front of bug with a standard 19 mm MC, the pedal is fine. My advice is to just try a stock MC and if your sure you have a problem, move on from there.


Pistons in my front Brembos, 37.5 mm & 26 mm

37.5 / 2 = 18.75 x 18.75 = 351.5625 x 3.1416 = 1104.46875

26 / 2 = 13 x 13 = 169 x 3.1416 = 530.9304
so total area is 3270.7983


Stock Beetle, calipers 40 mm

40 / 2 = 20 x 20 = 400 x 3.1416 = 1256.64
total area is 2513.28

Steve C

kdanie
September 11th 2002, 18:03
Trevor, what MC are you using now? Stock VW, single circuit or dual? Maybe a N/A 944 MC would work? I know it bolts in ok but I haven't had a chance to drive mine until the engine is installed and plumbed. If you pick a MC that is too large a dia. you can lengthen your pedal an inch and increase your leverage.
ken

ricola
September 12th 2002, 03:31
Does anybody know the bore diameters of the NA 944 m/c?

trevorbrady
September 12th 2002, 03:53
Originally posted by kdanie
Trevor, what MC are you using now? Stock VW, single circuit or dual?
I'm using the stock VW dual circuit MC.
Good point about the 944 one, do you know what bore it is?
Ideally I am looking for something that will bolt in place of the old one. If this is a bigger bore, it should be ideal...

kdanie
September 12th 2002, 12:19
I opened mine up to make sure it was clean and worked ok but never measured it.
ken

MdR
September 12th 2002, 16:08
Originally posted by kdanie
I opened mine up to make sure it was clean and worked ok but never measured it.
ken

Ken
My m/cyl has the bore sizes cast into the outside (top) of the body. Maybe yours has too.
Martin

MattKab
September 12th 2002, 19:42
'My '79 has a stock 1303 m/c and it operates 4 Brembo 4pots perfectly. You can increase the length of the pushrod action(???) by moving the pedal stop forward, this brings the pedal back and down.

Due to the amount of writings about other, larger bore m/c's being recommended, I have had my brakes tested on the rollers at the MOT station. The inspector was impressed.

When I'm bleeding the air out, I get a feel of how much fluid is 'behind' the pedal, front and rear. I'm perfectly satisfied.

I'm not the first to use a stock m/c with this conversion.

My car was converted to RHD and the pedal stop is maybe a couple of mm forward and needed no adjustment before, or after the brake conversion.

Heavy braking from high speeds, even on bends in the wet gives me no concerns.

Possibly the precision of the Brembo calipers keeps the brakepad retreat to a minimum, less 'backlash' for want of a better word, there is considerably more area of slave cylinder than the 4drum Bug.

I know moving the pedal back, as stated above does nothing to alter the amount of fluid displacement, it does alter the mechanical advantage of the pedal/lever.

'Something to think about, consider all the relavent lengths and angles of the stock Bug brake pedal geometry, would it be the case that maximum mechanical advantage of the pedal coincides with the point where the energy is transfered during braking?
As we all used to know, the drums need constant adjustment, as wear gives loss of material, brake pedal 'bite' goes down to the floor. When the brakeshoes are nicely bedded-in and adjusted to tolerance, would it be that the brake pedal lever passes through the point of maximum mechanical advantage, as normal wear occurs before re-adjustment is needed?

Is your rear brake conversion part of a kit? Is it supposed to be compatible with the stock m/c?

911 between '65 and '85 had a m/c bore of 19.05mm if that's any help.

MattKab

MattKab
September 12th 2002, 19:58
....And Goodridge braided flexi-hoses are awesome! Forever guaranteed too.

If you're still running rubber hoses, grip them firmly, with both hands and get a buddy to pulse the brake pedal. You'll soon discover wasted fluid displacement and how much potential energy is winding up in the rubber.

The addition of these flexi-lines returned the stock feel to the brakes on my Bug. I wouldn't even risk trying the split bore m/c on my car.

MattKab over and out

kdanie
September 16th 2002, 15:32
Matkab, I read a magazine article recently about brakes, I can't remember which mag. and can't find it back. It stated that the pivot point for the master cylinder rod on the brake pedal should never go past 90 deg. over center or you will loose the mechanical advantage and pressure will drop. This information came from an aftermarket brake company (willwood, I think). Something to keep in mind when setting up your system.
I have a good book on performance brakes with a formula to take the guess work out of selecting a MC. I will try and remember to dig it out tonight.
ken

Steve C
September 22nd 2002, 19:47
Hi

Our registration people the Roads & Trafiic Authority will not allow braided lines to be fitted on street cars. They have a problem if used in dirty or dusty conditions, the dust will get in between the braid and the tube an the braid will wear awy the tubing. I took my braided hoses off because my car needs to be inspected by the RTA soon to cover mods I hace already done, I didn't really feel any difference, but I changes other things at the same time.

Steve C

MdR
September 23rd 2002, 07:07
Our MOT doesn't allow braided hoses either, but I ran my 914/4 with them without it failing the test.

MattKab
September 23rd 2002, 13:14
I had no idea they're not MOT approved. It didn't say so on the box and BBT didn't say anything. I'll look this week and quote what the MOT Inspectorate guidlines say. Thanks for raising the point! I'll find out where we all (UK) stand.

I may try sealing mine with some clear silicon. Interesting comment about the ingress of dirt causing wear under the braid.

ricola
September 24th 2002, 06:46
For road use, I read a really nat trick for braided brake hoses.
Buy some clear heatshrink tubing from somewhere like RS, or even colour coded to your brakes! This will stop grit getting trapped in the weave and abrading the rubber core.

Rich

ricola
September 30th 2002, 03:38
I was having a nose around my local VW breakers yard yesterday and had a look at a Bay window master cylinder. It looks like it is 20mm bore for both circuits which could prove ideal for my early 944 set-up. Just a bit more fluid than stock but should give a nice feel.

Has anyone tried this before? It looks like it will fit OK, there is a brake switch on it. The onlt difference will be that there is only one output for each circuit so a T piece will have to be used for the front circuit...

I have also been told that later model VW/Audis have compatible m/c s of bigger diameter: 20.65 and 21.65 mm

Rich

kdanie
October 3rd 2002, 12:04
I finally got a chance to dig out my brake book (burried under a pile of my wifes junk in the garage!). The book is HP books "Brake Handbook" by Fred Puhn. Selecting a M/C is not all that easy, chapter 9 is filled with math equations to figure everyting from center of gravity or your car, kinetic energy at speed, brake torque, maximum pressure to get max deceleration and finally M/C size to achieve the correct pressure.

Every one of our cars are different, weight, C/G, tire friction, caliper piston size/number. I recomend the book, it is filled with good tech info and will certainly broaden your knowlege and understanding of high performance brake systems.

I think the best bet for most of us is an accurate article in the tech section covering what people have used that works. If forum members want to email me a discription of what they are using, M/C size/application and caliper type/application and any other info on your brake system, such as how the pedal feel/travel is, I will sift through the info and write a tech article for the website so all the info is in one place.

ken