![]() |
For a clean stockish look a diffusor would be be best,but it's hard to realize on a bug and remain subtle yet effective.
|
Quote:
|
One solution is to have a large rear wing like mine but make it removable. I can unbolt the wing and stanchions from the back of the car if I need to. It only leaves the feet of the stanchions on the car, you may have seen this on "ricer" cars. A smaller wing might fit up front or in the back seat for transport.
|
You could also try to make the ducktail spoler you allready have more effective.
In this autospeed article they talk about the vortex generators of the Mitsubishi Evo: Blowing the Vortex part 2 (a quote: "The longer the arrow, the faster the airspeed." :lmao: ..inside keversite joke) They talk a lot about less drag in the article, but I think these vortex generators are also there to direct more air to the rear spoiler, making it more effective. The new Beetle RSi also does this, but then with a rear window spoiler: http://www.vwvortex.com/gallery/albu...e%20RSI/12.jpg I think its primary function is to direct more airflow to the rear bonnet spoiler. Just some food for thought. Edit: I found the Mitsubishi research article, interesting read: Research article |
Quote:
|
Cool! Tnx for the pic and article. We just need to be carefull not to seem as if we are 'trying' (although a watercooled engine is not trying of course..)...:rolleyes:
I think I am pretty close to a decent placement with my old wing I tried a few years ago. Could maybe just be a tiny little bit wider with a bit bigger end plates. Plenty work to do this winter :) http://i174.photobucket.com/albums/w...03/DSC_281.jpg And yes, good airspeed is always important ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Just got back from Dyno-day (BTW 564 Nm = 418 lbs.ft) :):
http://i174.photobucket.com/albums/w...4.jpg~original |
Wally is that wheel or adjusted at engine regardless very impressive and unbelievable.
Congrats Alex |
Thanks; thats corrected to flywheel-hp. A healthy totally stock 1584cc T1 with just cheap header exhaust made 55 hp and another stock 1600 with electronic ignition made 52hp, so the dyno seemed very well calibrated.
I think it turned out to be about 15% correction iirc, so its about 400 RWHP for you guys ;-) |
Well done Wally.
|
Wow! 564NM!! It seems the new cam did make a difference.300NM at around 3600rpm! I bet it pulls like an elephant on crack....
Well done Wally!! |
is the small dip at 4000rpm the cam coming on? my n/a engine has the same small dip at 4000rpm as it comes on cam. very good numbers and i hope we can match your numbers with our new engine.
|
Quote:
But no, thats not the 'cam coming on' imo. Cam comes on much sooner then that, as does boost. I'am sure I can tune that out if I wanted to, but it would be for visual pleasure only. Its not like you feel that minute change in rising rate hp-climbing ;) I think the engine is now 'perfect'. Early super high torque and very high hp when you step on it some more. It does everything you throw at it. I wouldn;t know what to change or what would make it better. It also picks up from 1200 rpm onwards in 3rd gear (mine is a long one too) crawling through town. So, I was thinking of selling the engine and all ancillaries that make it work (for way less then the parts cost alone) to finance my new '36hp Challenge' -love and I would also love to see the Apfelbeck-project through someday. Not sure if there is a demand though. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:08. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© www.GermanLook.net 2002-2017. All Rights Reserved