[lightning bug]

Boy Wally, you really like running your mouth. EITHER

1) You are blind
2) You can't read
3) You get off on changing people's words around

If you read the post ,obviously you haven't. I said that the 2.7 is"not the best choice." Never said "it couldn't be made." I am finished with that thread. Now you want to start another debate? Wally please, don't start anything if you can't get the facts straight or you can't quote a previous post correctly. 2.7L T4, so what? I've seen a 2276 turbo T1 with 115,000 miles, street driven and raced numerous times, and only replaced the bearings. People say that 2276's, or any T1 with 94's for that matter, will never see 100,000 mi. It can be done and it has. And a 2.7 T4 can be done. My point......Are either of these engine's practical for the street? I still say no, and I have a 2276 turbo street car. There is a certain well-known T4 builder that doesn't recommend this displacement be built for the street either. What else do you want to talk about? Just wondering what your deal is. Its fine if I said what you stated, but I didn't. A little advise.... You can't quote it, unless it was said.