![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Which will give you the most long-term bang for your buck! | |||
air-cooled stock |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 16.00% |
air-cooled High Output |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 32.00% |
water-cooled conversion |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 52.00% |
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Longevity of High Output Motors
Hey All! Here's a good place to let us know how long your High Output motors run before they need some major tweaking(read $). Let us know how much you spent, how hard and far you drive it, and how many miles you've laid down before you've needed something major done. Regular maintenance aside, so adjusting the valves, new points, oil change and plugs are not counted. For those with small diameter front tires, round down because your speedo says you've put on more miles than you actually have.
If all answer truthfully, we can get a rough idea how far a HO motor will go for the $.
__________________
If I could just get paid for my sleepless nights.... 1960 VW Bug UBRDUB Walkaround 1st Drag Run Dyno Run Oval Ragster-'57 Rag/'04 Boxster S |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
My vote goes toward the water conversion. Though you spend time routing water lines; the power is going to be more reliable as it is not stressed, it's stock. Stock rebuilds will be easier than designing a engine, cheaper too especially if you don't have the experience.
I'd go with a 13b rotary conversion, and a small turbo. This will be fast and though rotarys are not thought of as reliable; it will last 100,000 miles under boost, and give you a stock 9g rev limit. Probably looking in the range of 200hp with only three moving parts. Plus it seems easier, don't have to worry about losing parts because of break ins, lifters, capatablity of parts (as they're mostly stock), and if you want the frist one can be pulled from a junk yard. But one serious down fall to a water conversion using a newer engine, the rebuild will be expensive. In the case of the rotary you'll pay a good 800 bucks on "okay" apex seals, and be looking at 450 bucks for a rotor housing (though these are not replaced on every build; apex seals should be). But you don't have to think as much, don't worry so much about internals working together (cam durations, timing, lift, right piston size), but more so the externals, turbos, timers, bov's, fuel injection, and stuff easily accessable too. You sort of leave one set of problems for another, question is which do you feel more confortable dealling with. And which are easier to fix, replacment water pumps, or rebuilt turbos are easier than new cams and cranks. http://frost.bbboy.net/vwengineconversions If you don't already know theres some good info there on most conversions. Frankly if I hadn't put the money and time into the type IV I'd be getting a 13b. Also before you spend money, find a few forums, not just VW ones. I vist the Rx7club.com nice forum there, with plenty of inteligent people. I think I saw Shad Laws there a while back too. That's why I got the Rx7 brakes, stated looking there for engine info, and fell in love with the stock 4 pot brakes that are on these cars. easy rip
__________________
Rip H. Van Winkle "The Ultimate Sleeper" Last edited by rip; July 4th 2005 at 18:00. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
My recommendation for a "Freshening up" of an aircooled Performance engine comes at 80K miles. Note that this is SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE and the engine more than likely will not HAVE to receive it.
I have many 150HP 2270s alive for 80-100K and still going strong. It all in the combo!
__________________
Jake Raby |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Hey Jake,
Thanks for the reply. I'm glad that you underscore a reliable motor. Buiders that talk about a 200hp type I motor that will be reliable are liars whether they know it or not. A 150hp type IV sounds just about right for the long haul. I would do that if I was staying air cooled. Just out of curiousity, what would that motor cost as a turn key? Jason
__________________
If I could just get paid for my sleepless nights.... 1960 VW Bug UBRDUB Walkaround 1st Drag Run Dyno Run Oval Ragster-'57 Rag/'04 Boxster S |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
while i debated many options during the build of my bug, i went HO air to help keep the hobby alive. i built a bug because i wanted a bug and all of the things that come with the aircooled family. i went TIV for torque and long term reliability.
i see absolutely nothing wrong with the other options. they all have their pros and cons. mine was purely a decision of staying true to aircooled for that car. now my T3 Vanagon is another thing. not sure yet what direction i will go there. it is a budget beater project so the "deal" will greatly determine the result. thinking EJ25 or EJ22 Subaru conversion though. rotary is appealing just for something different for me. not a great torque engine for a van though.
__________________
zen '73 2316 TIV GL Standard Bug (quasi) Company Branding, Graphic Design, and Web Services at DigiVinci Design |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I've seen old school mini's with a Suzuki Hayabusa motor....200 stock hp.....15,000 rpm redline....sky's the limit for turbo and aftermarket parts for it. It's like the Civic of the motorcycle world....turbo those motors push some NASTY numbers....
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Bump! Need more info and stories!
__________________
If I could just get paid for my sleepless nights.... 1960 VW Bug UBRDUB Walkaround 1st Drag Run Dyno Run Oval Ragster-'57 Rag/'04 Boxster S |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Speaking of the 'Busa conversion, I have a friend who is currently working on putting a GSXR1100 engine in a Fiat 500. Pretty trick. I'll let you know how it turns out.
As far as longevity, I think you hit on an important point. The issue is how much HP am I happy with, and what engine can meet that criteria without over working it. Certainly you can build a T1 or T4 for 500HP, but it won't last long. A Suby would be better suited, if not a SBC. If you're looking for ~150HP, The T4 would be my choice. If you want <125HP, a well built T1 will do. More than 200HP, I'd look at water cooled conversions. That would be my guideline just from several thousand hours of reading other people's experiences online. Of course, if money isn't an issue, throw all of that out the window.
__________________
72 Standard- 1600 stocker..for now It's YELLOW Rolling on a daily basis. VKG |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Bump, keep it coming! Would you guys that are posting also tell us how long you've been in the VW scene for? I think that time might equal experience, so I'm curious what people who've been doing this for a long time think.
Jason
__________________
If I could just get paid for my sleepless nights.... 1960 VW Bug UBRDUB Walkaround 1st Drag Run Dyno Run Oval Ragster-'57 Rag/'04 Boxster S |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Ecotec
The best bang for the buck in my book are the newer ecotec motors. You can buy the motors with 10,000-20,000 miles for $250-$400, stock hp is 140, w/computer 170, N/A with mods and computer 225, Turbo with stock internals up to 380, Turbo with internals... anything up to 1390 (thirteen hundred and ninety) hp! My friend has 18,000 miles on a turbo stock internaled 2.2 cavalier with a T3/T4 with 350 hp @ i think 15 lbs of boost. Power and reliability. $2500 for motor, computer, turbo, and adapter.
__________________
1974 type 1 Turbo 6 piston brakes at all corners ![]() Project is taking all my money and it's all Germanlook.com's fault! 98' Audi A4 93' T-Bird (oh yeah!) 90' 911 C2 74' beetle |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
^^ Hahaha, the problem with a a cavalier is though...is it's HEAVY AS HELL....I think around like 3400lbs heavy. Holy hell, a G35 and other LUXURY cars weigh that much and have a huge V8 or V6 in there with tons of other leather heavy interior crap.....
Been there, done that. Also, that rear suspension SUCKS. He'll have ALOT of catching up to do to match what the beetle has to offer. I would also like to see where an ECU gives 30HP on a stock motor. Not to burst your bubble, but those HP numbers are a bit inflated. It's a great motor, sure, but meh, There's better performance out there for less money. Yeah, the motor is cheap, but the fact you have to fabricate to get it in, just so you have 140HP of electrical GM headaches, is not worth it to me. You have to spend another $1500 on fabrications to get 140HP...then on top of that, the mods to get the motor in the high HP area....not worth it. In the end you just spent a ton of money when you coulda got either a Type 4, a Porsche conversion, or a Subaru conversion.....started out with a higher BASE HP and a bigger aftermarket. And well, you'de end up spending all that money on fab, why not get something that works out better in the long-run... ....I dunno, I don't think I'de want a GM product in my dub... Last edited by oicdn; July 20th 2005 at 10:24. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|