![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
				
				brakes
			 
			
			
			interesting read, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			my maths too are bad   maybe i should stay away from formulas !Angelo 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Type 3 Fastback  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
		
		 Quote: 
	
 I tried reasoning with it too and it is totally useless trying to calculate it, although I agree with most of EvilC's post ;-) Just try out one combo and change according to your experience. Works much better for me. I now have 993 rear brakes (30/34 cups) at the rear and GT2 rear brakes (330x28 with 28/30 cups) at the front with stock MC. While the cups are much BIGGER at the rear, I still have quite a noticeble front bias as the front still locks up (too) easy and I have really the most front weight beetle of most here... How you explain that? So, just try and adjust, try and adjust  
		Last edited by Wally; August 31st 2008 at 16:02.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
		
		 Quote: 
	
 Also, when working out a brake system, don't get tied up on the hydraulic bias calculations because overall you are concerned with brake torque. There is a hydraulic component to the brake toque calculation, but there are additional variables like moment arm (disk diameter) and the friction coefficient of the pad. I've got the Boxster S brakes (318x30, 40/36 F and 298x24, 30/28R...IIRC) with a stock 19mm dual circuit and I do have a slight front bias. Works great, I don't think I could improve this setup with aftermarket MC's... Lanner Last edited by flat; August 31st 2008 at 21:02.  | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |