GermanLook Forums  

Go Back   GermanLook Forums > Technical Section > Wheels

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 8th 2008, 07:46
evilC's Avatar
evilC evilC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK Where Leics is more
Posts: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by $aint View Post
Which camber changes do you mean?


Do you have any data about this?
The front on a link pin or ball joint suffer camber change in roll from near vertical to horribly positive. The Macpherson strut suffers less badly but still has some changes.
The rear on a swing axle is absolutely chronic in roll going from several degrees poitive in droop to several degrees negative in compression. The IRS again suffers less badly but does go from positve camber to negative camber in droop to compression. To add figures to all this would require significant data on a wheel alignment gig and a chapter of a book.

I am not aware of any data relating to the tyres ability to cope with camber change but I ask you to imagine a situation where there is excessive camber, the taller profile tyre will keep the tread more readily in contact with the road than the lower profile tyre because the sidewall is not having to deform as much. Put another way if the load on the tyre is constant in both instances the sidewall of the tall profile tyre will deform more than the low profile tyre.

evilC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 8th 2008, 12:59
Simon Simon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilC View Post
The front on a link pin or ball joint suffer camber change in roll from near vertical to horribly positive. The Macpherson strut suffers less badly but still has some changes.
The rear on a swing axle is absolutely chronic in roll going from several degrees poitive in droop to several degrees negative in compression. The IRS again suffers less badly but does go from positve camber to negative camber in droop to compression. To add figures to all this would require significant data on a wheel alignment gig and a chapter of a book.
I'm sorry, I always only have a McPherson/IRS beetle in mind, forgot to add that

Corcerning the McPherson strut, I assume you mean the camber changes that come from compliance in the bushings?
Or do you mean other camber changes?

Quote:
I am not aware of any data relating to the tyres ability to cope with camber change but I ask you to imagine a situation where there is excessive camber, the taller profile tyre will keep the tread more readily in contact with the road than the lower profile tyre because the sidewall is not having to deform as much. Put another way if the load on the tyre is constant in both instances the sidewall of the tall profile tyre will deform more than the low profile tyre.
I've read some data about tires having the most grip when cornering when they have a fairly large negative (dynamic, ie total) camber (afaik it was >7 degrees).
Don't remember anything about the sidewall hight or strength being said in that article though.
I'll see if I can digg it up.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 10th 2008, 10:23
evilC's Avatar
evilC evilC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK Where Leics is more
Posts: 644
Quote:
Originally Posted by $aint View Post
I'm sorry, I always only have a McPherson/IRS beetle in mind, forgot to add that

Corcerning the McPherson strut, I assume you mean the camber changes that come from compliance in the bushings?
Or do you mean other camber changes?


I've read some data about tires having the most grip when cornering when they have a fairly large negative (dynamic, ie total) camber (afaik it was >7 degrees).
Don't remember anything about the sidewall hight or strength being said in that article though.
I'll see if I can digg it up.
The strut on a beetle is essentially pivotted at the top due to the compliance of the top bush and the bottom of the strut pivots on the ball joint in the track arm. at the other end of the track arm there is also a pivot. In roll the track arm describes an arc with the centre at the inner most pivot point of the track arm therefore, the outer ball joint moves laterally in relation to the chassis. As the bottom of the strut moves in or out because the top of the strut is a pivot point the angle of the wheel changes in relation to the body - usually it goes more negative. The actual camber or the angle of the wheel in relation to the ground would be the same if the roll centre of the suspension was at the inner point of the track arm but it isn't it is some distance further away that means the wheel camber would change. A further complication is that the geometry of a Macpherson strut means that as the roll increases the roll centre moves closer to the car and that affects the camber. All up, to establish the camber of the wheel to the road surface requires the input of the roll centre position, compression of the strut the ride height and the static camber.

To get maximum grip from a tyre the tread has to be flat on the road surface. To acheive that the geometry of the suspension and the compliance of the tyre (sidewall stiffness) all play a complex and interrelated part. You will see that on the circuit mechanics will be using a temperature probe to check the temperature across the tyre. The temp. is a function of how much a particular part of the tread is working. The aim is to have a constant temperature across the full width of the tyre

evilC
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:44.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© www.GermanLook.net 2002-2017. All Rights Reserved