#1
|
|||
|
|||
KB's and ring end gap
There seems to be some info floating around that I question. That KB hyperurtectic pistons expand more than cast. I believe it's less. And that the ring end gap needs to be different. This I think is true. What is the gap and why? TIA
__________________
914 race car, 2.0/4 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KB's and ring end gap
Hello-
There seems to be some info floating around that I question. That KB hyperurtectic pistons expand more than cast. I believe it's less. Yes and no. Of the three major (i.e. nearly exclusive) modern aluminum piston alloys, 390, a hypereutectic casting alloy, expands the least of them, with 4032 as #2 and 2618 as #3. Of course, their strength is in that opposite order... a lovely no-way-to-always-win problem :-). I suspect that the new cast pistons are also 390... so they expand the same. And that the ring end gap needs to be different. This I think is true. What is the gap and why? TIA Ring gap has a lot more to do with the cylinder than the piston. Set them up as you always would. Take care,
__________________
Shad Laws |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The hypers are the weakest!!? Holy Schmoly, I better get some forged. You say set the ring gap as you always would. What would that be? as I really don't know. I have stock 94s bored to 96. They (KB) are saying twice what your would normally set on the top ring.
__________________
914 race car, 2.0/4 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|