![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the advice, I will be following it (and others) CLOSELY!
The other night(after you posted it) I read it, but it all went over my head. It was late, and I couldnt really think all that hard(well, I seldomly can! ). I havent given it a once over again(yet), but will do. My first priority is to get that engine out the Vanagon and on the workbench/floor in my workshop(still in the making).I havent sat on my aR$e though. I have searched the net for "coil binding" as well, for some visual aid. I have not really found something that I could say clears the mud though. Any references would be appreciated though(hint-hint). I have been thinking about this dilema too. And this is what I have come up with. My previous boss machined the case and heads. The heads was done with the "eye measure" tool. So I think he might have machined the #3 too deep. Giving me a wrong deckhight, causing the intake valve to hit the piston. Would this assumption be correct? This is what I found on STF(which I believe confirms my worries): Quote:
So i am not going further with this at the moment, before the engine is back on the stand and stripped to bare case(with c/rods, c/shaft, cam shaft etc installed), or should I strip it down completely and start from SCRATCH?(i.e. is there anything else that he might've missed inside that would cause serious problems later?). PS. I do think I have got the Cam manufacturer wrong, but still think the "110" is correct. I will try and found the packaging/ask me previous employer. |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|