#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
There are a lot of 944 parts cars out there. I got everything I needed for less than $200.
Better brakes for the cost of VW parts, thats a good deal to me. We are talking about Porsche parts. They did all the R&D you could ask for. Their reputation is earned. Then again.... some people hate them because they are Porsche. Those are they same people that hate everything Porsche... they hate the people that buy Porsche cars, that fix up old Porsches, that adapt Porsche parts, they hate all things Porsche. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
CB's stuff is good. I've used their brakes myself. Porsche stuff is better. Easily obtainable, easily re-built, over engineered, and greater quality for the same or less money than CB's brakes. Those are the facts. Others here agree. If you can't see through your own arrogance at the difference in quality between the two then there's no sense in my trying to explain it. You can be as pompus, and condecending as you want, the facts are what they are. Have a good evening.
__________________
Yetibone '71 1302S 1.8 '73 1303S 2.3 '83 928S 4.7 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
This is an interesting topic.
No real reason for Porsche 944 brakes, you could use anything from a bigger car. The 944 conversion is widely done successfully and has supporting parts (ie the Kerscher ball joint). So there is the ease of the conversion verses something off another manufacturer. The front to rear bias is not perfect but works well enough. I agree with Rich and others that OEM stuff is generally better made than aftermarket parts. I also like being able to visit my local shop for parts rather than order them across the net and wait for many many weeks while the bits make there way to New Zealand. (all except that damn ball joint- which is probably going to be changed on my setup, so I can get it locally). One of the guys in our local VW club has the CB rear disks. His car stops extremely well. If the kit is well made and works then go for it. The rear disks are a huge bonus. The wow factor is always a nice bonus- but you get that running big disk brakes from any manufacturer. As for the wieght- yep the early NA 944 stuff is heavy, so the rest of your components need to compensate for that, ie spring rates and shock rates etc. No real black magic, I used golf inserts and upgraded my springs and the car handles beautifully now- much much better than it did stock.
__________________
1302 RAt "GermanLook" |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Then there's the caliper. Originally CB used a 914 caliper. It had the advantage of an external mechanical lever to actuate the piston for the e-brake. Very simple with very little moving parts. Since those are not commonly available anymore, they now use a (Ford?) caliper. That is certainly more available anywhere in North America than any Porsche part is. The Big disadvantage of the 944 brakes is the silly drum brakes within the rotor. Talk about a huge increase in complexity compared to a simple lever on the caliper. Do you think your FLAPS is gonna have those silly brake shoes in stock when you need them? Likely, you will have to order them (probably from California). Any problem with the CB caliper, your FLAPS will have it in stock. Same for the pads. Great if you are on a road trip. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Funny n/body mentioned this, but for me a great benefit is the 'free' 5x130 porsche lug pattern on a 944 brake conversion as I only run P-wheels on all of my aircooled cars and with the extra off-set, most modern P-wheels with their large ET's fit right on without spacers or anything. But everybody that wants the easy way out and mail-order a system that has less braking power (you can only judge this really if you have experienced both systems) and costs twice as much than having to visit a dirty (yuck!) scrapyard, be my guest. But otherwise you're totally right, I only do the porsche braking swap for bragging rights and status Mwhahahah! |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I think those with experience with the subject, know to value this added bonus of the P-rotors with the centering ring at the rear |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
my 2cent
__________________
Mike '04 R32 Tornado Red '02 New Beetle TDI - Daily driver '64 Ghia - Project!!-Subaru EJ20T, MS/EDIS, 993 brakes, 914 Tranny... |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The shoes in the P-car rear are not used to brake the vehicle. Therefore there is VERY little wear. I've taken apart a 20 year old 944 with original shoes, cleaned them up and reused them because they were good as new. If the shoes are improperly adjusted, then they will drag and wear, else you're good for a long while. Lanner |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
When you are young, you are most concerned with how fast you can go.
The older you get, you are more conconcerned with how fast you can stop. I'll take the P-car brakes and extra unsprung mass for TUV standards, quality build, driver confidence and the WOW factor. That said, any proper upgrade from stock is a good upgrade. Talk to Lanner (aka Flat) or one of our other sponsors in person before you go CB, then make a well informed decision. Nothing "wrong" with the CB stuff.
__________________
zen '73 2316 TIV GL Standard Bug (quasi) Company Branding, Graphic Design, and Web Services at DigiVinci Design |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
It's been a long time since I've posted, but finally an interesting topic!!! I like your stance about the topic Zen, and I understand your point Bruce. It's true that sometimes on this forum things get carried away like: you've GOT to have P-brakes and you've GOT to have a tIV and DTM. CB stuff is good anough, type 1 engines are good anough, as long as you have fun and the car is safe, + they are more conveniant. But on a strictly performance point of view, Porsche parts are better and Flat is the man that's got the most expertise and respect regarding brake parts; afterall, he did them all: from porsche to Toyota 4 runner brakes, and Mazda and Golf parts in between. I think we can trust his opinion more than anybody here.
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Lanner did a Wonderful job on my 944 n/a porsche brakes on my 69 and I love them!!! It is the best investment I have ever made on my bug!!! I will never have stock brakes or c.b. 's brakes on any of my aircooled VW's.... 944 ALL THEY WAY HANDS DOWN!
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I also compared the mounting flanges. The 944 flanges push the wheel further out by 16mm compared to a 914 rotor on a Type 3 hub (also the CB rotohub) If your wheels have a small offset, this works against you. I'm gonna do some weight comparisons soon. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Bruce, you are not helping the cause. You are shooting holes in years of mind washing and convincing that the Porky brakes are the only way to go. If my wife reads this, there is no way I will get to waste tons of money on the oversized eye candy/brakes I want. How dare you back up your blasphemy with actual comparisons and facts!
(I know Bruce has sense of humour, to anyone else who is offended, I'm only funnin' with Bruce about the brake debate) Jeff-
__________________
No current VW projects 54 Chevy wagon LS2 AWD 56 Chevy Panel "Lost Cause" VKG Bastage child |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Hi
Ive got say that I was pretty unimpressed with E brake on my steel 944 arms that I had on my 1302. They would not lock the rear wheels and would not slow the car at speed, but they held OK on hills, I suspect that this was something to do with the VW lever - 944 E brake ratio. Im going to use 944 system complete on my new car with the E brake lever mounted next to the drivers seat between the door, this might make entrance into the car a pain in the arse (in more ways than one). When I had Porsche brakes on my 1302, I learnt to lip read, when I pulled up in traffic you could see people in other cars saying that bug has Porsche brakes on it. Steve
__________________
STI powered 1303 in the works. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|