GermanLook Forums  

Go Back   GermanLook Forums > Technical Section > Engines

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old December 22nd 2006, 06:03
chug_A_bug's Avatar
chug_A_bug chug_A_bug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada, Ontario,
Posts: 1,179
nice job Pete congras on that

Chris.
__________________
74 Std. GL
08 Vw rabbit
18 WR250R
07 Chevy 3500 Dually
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old December 23rd 2006, 15:55
Rob's Avatar
Rob Rob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dundas, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 786
Congrats Pete !

Don't spend all that cash on a new motor.....at least not right away

Rob.
__________________
EJ25 powered 1970 Standard Beetle
Subaru EJ25 in 1970 Beetle Project
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old October 7th 2009, 07:31
Bugscandrift Bugscandrift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 89
Promotion means raise!! Motor building fund..
__________________
If god had meant people to walk, whyd he invent cars?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old October 7th 2009, 18:24
volkdent's Avatar
volkdent volkdent is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Posts: 1,685
Of course I'm going to play devil's advocate and suggest it might be time to look at what a Sti motor is going for these day with REALLY big and REALLY reliable HP Or just do Type IV torque and leave the turbo out of it!

Jason
__________________
If I could just get paid for my sleepless nights....
1960 VW Bug UBRDUB
Walkaround
1st Drag Run

Dyno Run
Oval Ragster-'57 Rag/'04 Boxster S
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old October 7th 2009, 20:01
vdubzack's Avatar
vdubzack vdubzack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near, Washington, D.C.
Posts: 177
I'd go for type4 and forgo all the extra work. I love my 2.8 and am building another one as we speak for a guy in the UK. How about a turbo 2056 type four mill?
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old October 8th 2009, 05:11
Wally's Avatar
Wally Wally is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,552
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkdent View Post
Of course I'm going to play devil's advocate and suggest it might be time to look at what a Sti motor is going for these day with REALLY big and REALLY reliable HP Or just do Type IV torque and leave the turbo out of it!

Jason
I dunno what your suggesting, but my turbo type 4 gives 270 VERY reliable hp and I use it on the track everywhere and drag race it as well (12,05 in my heavy 1303).
I don't think I spend more on the engine than a complete STi engine would have costed incl. an upgrade for the STi engine as they don't give that much hp in stock form
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old October 8th 2009, 06:08
vdubzack's Avatar
vdubzack vdubzack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near, Washington, D.C.
Posts: 177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wally View Post
I dunno what your suggesting, but my turbo type 4 gives 270 VERY reliable hp and I use it on the track everywhere and drag race it as well (12,05 in my heavy 1303).
I don't think I spend more on the engine than a complete STi engine would have costed incl. an upgrade for the STi engine as they don't give that much hp in stock form
Your type of mill is what I am recomending. the Sti Engine is heavier, more fabrication needed. And th extra weight of the coolant is also an issue. I personally love air cooled power. But never a fan of the overstressed type 1. Thats why I recomended the type 4. I was going to turbo my 2.8 (left compression 8.0:1 just in case) but the power right now is acceptable. But still looking into it. That is if I can convince Marty Stagg From Staggs Racing to build me the manifold I want.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old October 8th 2009, 13:37
petevw's Avatar
petevw petevw is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: toronto, ontario, canada
Posts: 1,348
This is an old thread....

For those who are wondering. Carb'd 2275 is ready for install, and a 2332EFI turbo is on the stand.

Some more carnage pics of that aspirated 2332EFI:











__________________
'72 super
'65 bus
'52 split
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old October 8th 2009, 14:50
vdubzack's Avatar
vdubzack vdubzack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near, Washington, D.C.
Posts: 177
Wink

Why am I so upset? My guess is that It got hot and ate a valve? I have a 2.0L type four case for you. When you are ready.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old October 8th 2009, 18:14
petevw's Avatar
petevw petevw is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: toronto, ontario, canada
Posts: 1,348
Valve snapped just below valve keeper on #3's exhaust valve.

Was using a 2-piece lashcap/keeper setup that had WAYYYY too much time on them.



Quote:
Originally Posted by vdubzack View Post
That is if I can convince Marty Stagg From Staggs Racing to build me the manifold I want.
If you open your wallet enough, i'm sure he can be convinced. I've met Marty, and he's a standup guy.

Pete
__________________
'72 super
'65 bus
'52 split
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old October 8th 2009, 21:20
vdubzack's Avatar
vdubzack vdubzack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near, Washington, D.C.
Posts: 177
If you open your wallet enough, i'm sure he can be convinced. I've met Marty, and he's a standup guy.

Trying to stay on budget.LOL
Here is another one off to a new home.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P8200799 (Small).JPG (58.7 KB, 46 views)
File Type: jpg P8200800 (Small).JPG (40.2 KB, 36 views)

Last edited by vdubzack; October 8th 2009 at 21:43.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© www.GermanLook.net 2002-2017. All Rights Reserved