#16
|
||||
|
||||
Humble,
You brought up valide point about tires.. street vs race slicks.. which has to be factored into the equation. What about pads.. I know on my street/track car I use to mix front and rear pads at times depending on the track and tire choices I had.. What is everyone using as their respective characteristics will have an impact on lock up also? Alex
__________________
Alex Olaverri Sales Associate for Bug@5-Speed (US) Email: Bugat5speed@yahoo.com Tele: 973 204-5463 |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Clive |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
[QUOTE=Humble;70404]The #'s on the MC are 26 and 20
QUOTE] I too would have thought that the numbers refer to the bore but the information I have been able to gleen is that the 930 ran plain bore 20mm pistons. It maybe that my numbers relate to a different (earlier?) version of the model in the same way that the 944 m/c changed to a stepped bore from a plain bore. I presume that the #26 is at the pedal end of the bore? Clive |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
[QUOTE=evilC;70407]
Quote:
AFAIK it was used with a brake booster as well (1984: 930 355 027 00, >1984: 930 355 027 02) |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Humble, The #20/26 can't be the piston sizes as the larger one would have to be at the pedal end! If the caliper piston sizes were smaller at the rear then it would have been more likely that the m/c would have the same bore size for front and rear circuit since the bias will have been controlled by the caliper sizing. It would be unusual for the manufacturer to have controlled it by both the caliper and the m/c (late 944 excepted). The 23.8mm (15/16") bore size does imply a power assisted pedal as it is quite large for non-servo assistance, which are generally </=19mm
Clive |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|