GermanLook Forums  

Go Back   GermanLook Forums > Technical Section > Engines

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 29th 2003, 21:16
elektrik elektrik is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 9
+200 hp possible?

dear friends,
is it possible to modify a 2.0l cu t4 block to get it so far that he delevers me more than 200hp? what chould me costs this? what modifications schould i do? offers (by mail please)?

the engine is for a bug from '69
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 29th 2003, 22:45
yetibone's Avatar
yetibone yetibone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 705
No.

If you could get that kind of power from an engine that size, thru forced induction, or nitrous, it wouldn't last long.

If you want that kind of power, a 2.4 litre fuel injected, Porsche cooled, exotic head havin', split lift and duration cam usin', nickisil cylinder havin' monster might get you right at 200 hp.



Yetibone
__________________
Yetibone
'71 1302S 1.8
'73 1303S 2.3
'83 928S 4.7
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 29th 2003, 23:01
hybrid_john hybrid_john is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Spring Creek, Nevada
Posts: 420
yetibone is right if you use a displacement that big it won't last more than a few thousand miles at best before you replace something criticle, I've seen a 2.9 lt. t4 that lasted about 30,000 miles but the guy was working on it three or four time a week...

Do your home-work on this one, elektrik, and you'll find something to fit your taste, but ask as many questions you need when talking to an engine builder, like how long should it last, is it driveable on the street, etc. Stuff like that and it should get you by!

John
__________________
There is no cure for our disease
'69 standard ( under the knife)
'72 1302 GL ( under the knife and on hold)
VolkSport Kfer Gruppe
www.VolkSport.net
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 30th 2003, 11:40
yetibone's Avatar
yetibone yetibone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 705
If you plan on building it yourself, like me, find out what combinations of parts work best for the size engine you want. Also, if you build it yourself, don't be ashamed to let someone with experience do the tricky stuff that you may not be comfortable doing.

1971cc (2.0L) will have a particular combination of cam profile, valve size, rod length, and compression that is optimal for it's size.
2056cc will have a DIFFERENT combination of things that will work best for it's configuration. 2270cc has IT'S own build formula, 2316cc has its own, and so on.

Point being, you can't make a modified Type IV work efficiently unless you use the right combination of parts for the displacement that you want.

Check with an experienced builder of Type IV engines for some answers.

Good Luck!



Yetibone
__________________
Yetibone
'71 1302S 1.8
'73 1303S 2.3
'83 928S 4.7
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 30th 2003, 11:51
judgie's Avatar
judgie judgie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: northants uk
Posts: 355
well 200bhp might be pushing it,am in the process of building a stock bore and stroke 2ltr 44x38 vavles 45mm throttle bodies web 86c cam etc,etc and am hopeing for about 165bhp have been told this is about the limit for a 2ltr.and before any body tells me to build a bigger engine i need to keep under the 2ltr to stay in the under 2ltr class.
cheers rob
__________________
my race car build galleryhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/1406263...7602662665607/
my web site www.rnjmotorsport.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 30th 2003, 13:56
Massive Type IV's Avatar
Massive Type IV Massive Type IV is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 442
200 HP is more than possible, but don't think it comes easily..... It will take a 2316 at smallest to get you there in a sane manner.

Most engines need to be 2.5 L t think about making that power.
__________________
Jake Raby
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 30th 2003, 18:00
elektrik elektrik is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 9
how fast en how many hp gat the engine standard? i wil that the car c'an drive 200km/h without any problem
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 30th 2003, 19:29
boygenius's Avatar
boygenius boygenius is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Spring Hill. Florida
Posts: 1,663
I think the 914 2.0 type 4 motor had 95 hp and 105 torque. My 1969 beetle would go 145 kph with 60 hp and 90 torque. It ran out of gearing when the valves floated at 4,000 rpm. Your top speed is dependant on your gearing.
__________________
I love my money pit, uhm, err, I mean my car.
1969 beetle in the works... 2.0 type 4 DTM...
2004 Suzuki GSX-R 1000 crashed
www.volksport.net Volksport Kfer Gruppe
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old December 1st 2003, 10:25
vujade's Avatar
vujade vujade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: DB, FL, US
Posts: 2,705
Quote:
Originally posted by elektrik
how fast en how many hp gat the engine standard? i wil that the car c'an drive 200km/h without any problem
Huh? :silly:
__________________
WinterJam 2010: Vdub, Surf, Skate & Musis Fest
WinterJam 2010

'I drive way to fast to worry about cholesterol!'

'67 Sunroof Notchback * '68 FI Squareback
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old December 1st 2003, 20:23
elektrik elektrik is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 9
i'ts a standard bug gear, maybee in the future I wille plaece a porsche transmission

by the way what doe I modiffy for safety? rolkage? 4points seat-belt with some sparco's or cobra seats? somthing els? random disk's break's? or only at front
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old December 1st 2003, 23:16
hybrid_john hybrid_john is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Spring Creek, Nevada
Posts: 420
elektrik: Hey man, I think I know what your trying to say?!
If you wanna add a roll cage or some racing seat with four or five point harnesses, i'ts a good idea but it's completely up to you! If you plan on running with some disk brakes you can run them on either the front or the back, or maybe even both, just remember what ever combos you plan on doing is completely up to you!

You don't even have to run brakes if you don't want to!:silly:
But I wouldn't recomend it!

John
__________________
There is no cure for our disease
'69 standard ( under the knife)
'72 1302 GL ( under the knife and on hold)
VolkSport Kfer Gruppe
www.VolkSport.net
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old December 2nd 2003, 20:27
boygenius's Avatar
boygenius boygenius is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Spring Hill. Florida
Posts: 1,663
Where do you live that you can drive 200 km/h? What year and model is your beetle. Disc brakes are a good idea since drum brakes can fade from heat when stopping from high speed.
__________________
I love my money pit, uhm, err, I mean my car.
1969 beetle in the works... 2.0 type 4 DTM...
2004 Suzuki GSX-R 1000 crashed
www.volksport.net Volksport Kfer Gruppe
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old December 2nd 2003, 23:01
hybrid_john hybrid_john is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Spring Creek, Nevada
Posts: 420
Drum brakes can fade from high-speed stops, but, disk brakes can crack and smoke extremely bad from high-speed stops. I did that with my Sunfire coming down a steep grade going 80...:silly:

The front disk brakes cracked so bad that they shreaded the brake pads and ground down the drivers side caliper.

I will never go that fast with stock brakes again, which, brings me to my point. Is it possible that even though you upgrade to a Porsche brake system, that with the stock Porsche disk brakes they might crack and smoke the same?

Just wondering

But non the less, disk brakes are way better than drums.

John
__________________
There is no cure for our disease
'69 standard ( under the knife)
'72 1302 GL ( under the knife and on hold)
VolkSport Kfer Gruppe
www.VolkSport.net
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old December 2nd 2003, 23:48
boygenius's Avatar
boygenius boygenius is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Spring Hill. Florida
Posts: 1,663
Some people could break a pry-bar in a sand box. My friend cracked his 12" rotors in his car doing a 140 mph to zero. The stock porsche brakes mostly used are 944 parts and they were designed for a car that weighs 2,600 lbs. or more. So a 1,800 lbs. beetle really doesn't put that much stress on the brakes.
__________________
I love my money pit, uhm, err, I mean my car.
1969 beetle in the works... 2.0 type 4 DTM...
2004 Suzuki GSX-R 1000 crashed
www.volksport.net Volksport Kfer Gruppe
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old December 3rd 2003, 12:54
elektrik elektrik is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 9
for information my car is a 69 bug inported from holland to Belgium(case) chassis com from Belgium

i want to put somme 944 breaks ath te front en in te rear beetle breaks, the resson that i do this is because i buyed a new bug break cilinder, and it gives a good pression on the breaks with this combination

now i got a odder problem my gearbox that y revisated don't fit on my chassis my gearbox is mounted with 2 bolts ath te front but my chassis gat a mountaning plase with 3 bolds, how c'an i modiffy this?

thank you all for the great help assistanse
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:44.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© www.GermanLook.net 2002-2017. All Rights Reserved