GermanLook Forums  

Go Back   GermanLook Forums > Technical Section > Brakes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 17th 2004, 06:42
Che Castro Che Castro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sydney NSW, Australia
Posts: 6
Yep i was referring to the post that was linked on one of the earlier pages.

What I didnt get was why the number of pistons on each caliper wasn't included.
__________________
Jon
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 17th 2004, 23:54
VWader04's Avatar
VWader04 VWader04 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 77
has anyone used or heard about using the
CSP #611 015 000
i heard some where that this would be a good option...but, i don't know though..im in the same boat as everyone else

20.64mm bore CSP master cylinder
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old December 31st 2004, 12:49
Vdubjim Vdubjim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 16
accoarding to pelican parts the 911 (up to 89) MC is only 19mm but maybe the volume is more??

and if using the 944 MC which one? there are like 4. EXPENSIVE!!!

Master Cylinder For Use With Girling Brake Booster, 944 (1983-86), 924S (1987-88), Each [Photo]
E-355-011-00 $221.55

Master Cylinder For Use With ATE Brake Booster, 944 (1983-86), 924S (1987-88), 944 Turbo (1986), Each
E-355-011-01 $140.20

Master Cylinder For Use With Girling Brake Booster, 944/944S (1987-88), 944S2 (1989-91), Each
E-355-011-10 $258.30

Master Cylinder For Use With ATE Brake Booster, 944/944 Turbo (1987-88), 944S/S2 (1987-91), 968 (1992-95), Each

Also maybe this helps? no pics though. I kow that jettas and stuff have a proportioning valve that basically screws into the MC wonder if this is the same? too bad its NLA.
Brake Pressure Regulator, 944 (1985-91), 944 Turbo (1986-89), Each
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 1st 2005, 11:15
Tim Tim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 182
Hello VWader04,
I am using the CSP 20.64mm m/c but it is used with the Kerscher front brake kit and the reinforced rear cylinders from CSP. I feel better front/rear brake bias and firmer/shorter pedal with the CSP m/c than the stock vw m/c (was used with the Kerscher front kit).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 1st 2005, 12:36
Vdubjim Vdubjim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 16
i wonder what car that is from?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 1st 2005, 18:14
MattKab's Avatar
MattKab MattKab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NW UK
Posts: 371
First of all Happy new year to all!

Shad's formula is standard textbook mechanical advantage formula. As Shad mentioned in his post, we are fortunate, in that we can use the formula in it's stripped down, simplified version. We can ignore factors like friction, radial differences front to rear, pad area, etc. as these can be considered to be constants

Like Wally, I still have the 3/4" T1 m/c and 40/36mm & 30/28mm Brembos (~15,000miles)

I got to a value of 1.72 to the front and I had 1.23 as the bias of NA 944 rears/T1 front and a T1 m/c.


If we had the 1986 only 944T Front calipers with their 36/34mm pots, we would have a bias of 1.45

This compares very well to the stock NA 944 with the Ate calipers bias of 1.44

Now compare this to the very earliest 911 which had a bias of 1.88 for the first year. This was then changed to 1.6

By lengthy mathematic (plus assumptions) I get the T1 front/CB roto hub and stock m/c to have a bias of 1.38

I put Al B's gold custom Bug (with the cool 'flame' wheels and ALL new parts) on our Arex computer test lane and I recorded stock T1discs/drums and m/c to have a bias of 1.57

I have 'invented' an m/c that can be 'made' for our Brembo 4pot systems that will yield a bias of 1.47...

If I fitted the Kerscher split bore m/c my bias would be down to 1.3

m/c bore has no affect on bias, just the leverage ratio.

Feel free to challenge my values, I still have the pages of arithmetic I used. Plus many possible configurations, feel free to ask.



Matt
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 3rd 2005, 12:39
Wally's Avatar
Wally Wally is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,552
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattKab
m/c bore has no affect on bias, just the leverage ratio.

Feel free to challenge my values, I still have the pages of arithmetic I used. Plus many possible configurations, feel free to ask.

Matt
Hi Matt,
I assume your above statement is a 'misprint' ? Anyway, it doesn't seem to match up with Shad's mathematics, who I value greetly.

I just fitted a 944 23/19mm mastercylinder and hope to inform you all the difference on brake bias as opposed to the stock 19/19mm m/c I had before.
Reason for the switch was my terrible brake bias: too little back-side braking.

Oh, I have now fitted the 23mm to the front, as it is stock in the 944, in order to lessen (!) the brake pressure to the front.

Regards,
Walter
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 1st 2005, 18:24
MattKab's Avatar
MattKab MattKab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NW UK
Posts: 371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vdubjim
i wonder what car that is from?
8v Golf
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old January 3rd 2005, 18:23
Vdubjim Vdubjim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 16
here is the vw one that looks to be a bolt in.
there is another but the spacing on the mount holes is too far apart
http://germanautoparts.com/Volkswage...it/Brake/137/5

these guys are usually the cheapest around and BEST quality. Normal price is 90-110.00 from what ive seen.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 16 (0 members and 16 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© www.GermanLook.net 2002-2017. All Rights Reserved