![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
In other words like the upper version then? That was the main reason I concidered that design too..
I just assumed that the weight of the transmission and engine would be more stress to the mount than the power the transmission tend to press the nose upwards when accelerating? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
hey just my thoughts on this I too think the upper version would
be better just use some Good 1/4" Plate and Guset the **** out of it lol plus like what Steve C said it would just Hang it it did Brake, and Not fall to the ground. Just my to cents. Chris.
__________________
74 Std. GL 08 Vw rabbit 18 WR250R 07 Chevy 3500 Dually |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
The top mount version would provide safety if the mount failed, but would seem to make removing the tranny quite a bit more difficult, as well, when the tranny is loaded during acceleration, the top mount will be in expansion, not compression, and this force is going to be working every time you accelerate.
As well, as I recall, those mounts have a bolt running through them, not just into the rubber, so the safety is there regardless? Might want to look at more modern motor and tranny mounts, if your fabbing up might as well make use of something with a better design? My 2 cents... Jason
__________________
If I could just get paid for my sleepless nights.... 1960 VW Bug UBRDUB Walkaround 1st Drag Run Dyno Run Oval Ragster-'57 Rag/'04 Boxster S |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
With the upper version you just loosen the rubbermounts and pull the whole thing. An other aspect would be that when you "motor brake" or how you say it the upper version will just compress the rubbermount where as the lower mount will expand the mount. Same thing also with no power on the drivetrain the weight of the engine and transmission will tend to expand the rubbermount. I'm now trying to find a original 911 mount including the rubbermounts as those work differently, not just two plates with molded rubber in the middle. If I use these I think I can make the lower type (original 911 style) with no problems... ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|