GermanLook Forums  

Go Back   GermanLook Forums > Technical Section > Engines

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 28th 2010, 16:16
Bad bug's Avatar
Bad bug Bad bug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkdent View Post
Go Suby. More power, more reliable, easier to source parts, more economical.

Jason
The subaru isn't more reliable. Waterboxers have been known to go 300K miles.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 29th 2010, 23:12
DORIGTT's Avatar
DORIGTT DORIGTT is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Forest Grove, Oregon
Posts: 700
Scooby's are more fashionable and relatively inexpensive after the adapter plate and the engine, and wiring harness modifications and...

No offense to the Scooby camp. It's all Vee Dub in some way shape or form.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old December 3rd 2010, 05:22
Joel's Avatar
Joel Joel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad bug View Post
The subaru isn't more reliable. Waterboxers have been known to go 300K miles.
You're about the only person I know with something nice to say about wassers
Everyone I've encountered with one has complained about cooling system problems and cost

Probably fine in a bug but too overworked in a bus
__________________
1974 Germanlook 1303 SUBA-beetle
Subaru EJ254, BoostR 17", topline suspension, 4 wheel discs and A/C
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old December 3rd 2010, 15:02
oasis's Avatar
oasis oasis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: timonium, md usa
Posts: 1,290
I had an '85 Vanagon (Transporter to most of the world) for six years and loved it. I didn't spend much money on it during that time but I was intense with keeping up on general maintenance, and made darn sure the coolant was phosphate-free. I would only say the 1.9L WBX was overworked if one wanted to drive spiritedly. On the other hand, our family used it for 1,000-mile trips without complaint.

Now having said that, if I got another Vanagon of some sort, I would probably go for a 2.0L ABA engine, a TDI of some sort, or maybe some offering from Jake. The two main reasons would be (1) most Vanagons are not kept up as they should, and (2) many parts have become NLA.

I saw a Type III in the UK for sale with a WBX and I had to tell myself a hundred times I want an air-cooled as my next car. It was very tempting.
__________________
(2004-2008): 1971 1302 w/2056
Searching for a new project ...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 28th 2011, 12:42
Bad bug's Avatar
Bad bug Bad bug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joel View Post
You're about the only person I know with something nice to say about wassers
Everyone I've encountered with one has complained about cooling system problems and cost

Probably fine in a bug but too overworked in a bus

I have a friend in Jamaica that put a 2.1 ltr waterboxer all stock in his 66 beetle, that car was a beast. I can recall once he came for me at work and carried me home, that was my first official drive in it, rain had fallen and a light film of water was on the road. After driving for sometime at a constant speed with all the torque of the engine the tires broke loose, after that experience i wanted one.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:53.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© www.GermanLook.net 2002-2017. All Rights Reserved